How does Scott Kivowitz's approach to generative AI in photography stand out?

Scott’s approach stands out because it is very practical and human-centered, not hype-driven or doomsday-focused.

• He treats AI as a complementary tool, not a replacement for photographers. In his videos on Photoshop’s Generative Fill and Imagen AI, he shows AI as a way to speed up culling and editing, while insisting the photographer remains the creative decision-maker.
• He emphasizes AI for inspiration and efficiency: using image generators to visualize ideas (like a forest session) and text tools as starting points for copy, not final drafts.
• He is transparent about limitations and errors, showing “good, bad, and ugly” results and reminding viewers to always review AI’s work.

Is there a specific part of AI in photography you are most curious about—editing, culling, or creative concepting?