How does Scott Kivowitz's approach to capturing abandoned school properties differ from other photographers?

Scott tends to approach abandoned schools with a mix of personal connection, caution, and storytelling rather than just “urbex shock value.”

From the Chesterbrook Academy of Manalapan series, notice a few things:

• Personal proximity and narrative: Scott walks a mile from his house, mentions the hot sun, empty water, and even his neighbor the real estate agent. The photos are anchored in a lived, local story, not just a “cool ruin.”

• Respect for boundaries: He explicitly notes the no trespassing sign and does not go inside. Many urbex photographers prioritize access; Scott prioritizes ethics and safety.

• Emotional details over decay porn: He highlights details like a drawing on a window that hints at how sad the closure was for kids, rather than only focusing on mold and destruction.

• Gear-conscious, process-focused: He shares exact settings (Leica M9, 50mm Summicron, apertures, shutter, ISO, Lightroom/VSCO), inviting others into his process. The emphasis is on thoughtful image-making, not just location bragging.

• Planning and patience: He treats the first visit as a scouting trip and plans to return in better conditions (cooler light, safer clothing), which is more like a long-term project than a one-off adrenaline run.

Would you like insight into how you can apply parts of this approach to your own abandoned-building photography?