How does Brian D Smith's method outperform traditional psychic readings?

Brian’s approach is almost the opposite of “traditional” psychic readings that rely on vague, feel‑good lines or quick hits.

• Evidence first, comfort second: Readings are evaluated and often scored (specific names, relationships, causes of death, unique memories), not just “your grandmother loves you.” General statements are treated as weak, not wins.
• Controlled setups: No prior contact, no social‑media digging, strict protocols (Zoom links sent by third parties, sitter identities hidden) to rule out hot and cold reading, mirroring what researchers like Gary Schwartz and Julie Beischel do.
• Skeptical, not gullible: Claims are challenged, errors acknowledged, and scores adjusted down on review. That preserves integrity.
• Integrated with grief support: Mediumship is one tool inside a broader, grounded grief framework (education, GEMS habits, afterlife evidence) aimed at long‑term healing, not addiction to readings.

What part of psychic or medium readings are you most skeptical or unsure about right now?