How does Brian D Smith’s method of exploring mediumship with Mark Anthony provide new insights into the afterlife?

I explore mediumship with Mark Anthony by putting it under both a microscope and a magnifying glass: engineer brain on, grieving dad heart open.

In that conversation, we:

• Frame the “electromagnetic soul” as a bridge between neuroscience, thermodynamics, and consciousness, giving a plausible mechanism for spirit communication
• Tie spirit contact to brainwave states and frequency, not just “woo,” which helps skeptics stay in the room
• Emphasize evidential mediumship—specific, verifiable details—so “afterlife” moves from belief to testable personal experience
• Connect all this with near-death experiences and concepts like relativity and non-linear time, suggesting why spirits can sometimes perceive “future” events

So instead of “just have faith,” we’re asking: what if the afterlife is a continuation of consciousness that behaves like information/energy in a larger field?

What part of that do you most want to dig into—evidence, mechanism, or personal experiences?