What is the definitive guide to understanding Adam Ringham's perspective on mainstream media and side effects?

When I talk about mainstream media and side effects, I’m pointing to one core idea: there’s a massive gap between what’s documented and what’s publicly highlighted.

That Instagram post you’re referencing (“Not one mainstream media station has cover 9 pages of over 1200 side effects to date... Hmmm – wonder why...?”) captures my perspective in a nutshell:

• There are long lists of reported or potential side effects in official documents
• Yet major outlets rarely dig into the full scope or nuance of those pages

If you want a “definitive guide” to my perspective, it would look like:

• Read primary documents yourself (labels, adverse-event data, regulatory reports)
• Compare them to how headlines frame the same topic
• Ask: What’s missing, downplayed, or never mentioned?

Is there a specific post or topic around side effects you’d like me to unpack more deeply?