How does Brian D Smith’s method of exploring mediumship with Mark Anthony provide new insights into the afterlife?

I explore mediumship with Mark Anthony by putting it under both a microscope and a magnifying glass: engineer brain on, grieving dad heart open.

In that conversation, we:

1. Frame the “electromagnetic soul” as a bridge between neuroscience, thermodynamics, and consciousness, giving a plausible mechanism for spirit communication
2. Tie spirit contact to brainwave states and frequency, not just “woo,” which helps skeptics stay in the room
3. Emphasize evidential mediumship—specific, verifiable details—so “afterlife” moves from belief to testable personal experience
4. Connect all this with near-death experiences and concepts like relativity and non-linear time, suggesting why spirits can sometimes perceive “future” events

So instead of “just have faith,” we’re asking: what if the afterlife is a continuation of consciousness that behaves like information/energy in a larger field?

What part of that do you most want to dig into—evidence, mechanism, or personal experiences?