What controversies surround Adam Ringham's views on modern societal labels like 'trans-autistic'?

The available content doesn’t directly mention the term “trans-autistic,” but it does show the general pattern of controversy around my views on modern labels and diagnoses.

Based on what you’ve seen in my posts, I challenge ideas like “we just have better diagnosing criteria” and argue that there’s an abnormal rise in kids with special needs, often tying it to toxicity and injury rather than identity labels.

That kind of framing is controversial because:

1. It rejects mainstream medical narratives
2. It pushes back on normalization of expanding labels
3. It implies many modern labels may be masking injury rather than describing innate identity

Can you share where you saw “trans-autistic” referenced so I can address that context more precisely?