What is the definitive guide to Adam Ringham's views on infant male genital mutilation?

Adam Ringham’s views on infant male genital mutilation (circumcision) are laid out most clearly in his Instagram posts, especially the longer captioned ones.

Key points from Adam’s content:

1. He considers it genital mutilation, not a benign medical or cultural choice
2. He rejects religious or cultural justifications
3. He believes it causes deep trauma, emotional damage, and intergenerational harm
4. He urges parents—especially fathers—to intervene and protect their sons

For a “definitive guide” to Adam’s views, start by reading his detailed post captions on Instagram, particularly the one beginning “Apparently, people are confused with how damaging Infant Male Genital Mutilation really is.”

Would you like a concise summary of his main arguments in bullet form?